oneshotlm
Compare all models on this prompt →

Boids flocking · qwen3.8-max-0902

Output generated Cost / run $0.1205 Runtime 170.8s

Prompt for this run

Build a full-screen canvas flocking simulation with 150 boids drawn as oriented triangles. Use HTML, CSS, and JavaScript as needed. Write it to `index.html` in the current working directory using your file tools. Inline your own CSS and JavaScript. Do not use external assets, CDNs, or network requests. No third-party libraries are provided. Required behavior: - Combine separation, alignment, and cohesion so nearby boids avoid crowding, align their headings, and form moving groups. Triangles point in their direction of travel. - Use bounded speed and steering so motion changes smoothly instead of teleporting. Wrap boids across screen edges. - Boids within a visible or documented cursor-influence radius steer away from the pointer. They resume flocking after the pointer moves away. - Provide Pause/Resume and Reset. Pause freezes simulation state; Reset restores a fresh population of 150 boids. - Fit the canvas to the viewport and keep the population and controls usable after resizing. Verify: Sample the flock at several moments to check coordinated movement and triangles pointing along their travel direction. Try the cursor interaction with available pointer actions, then pause and resume to check that the flock freezes and continues.

⛨ sandboxed Open in new tab ↗

TAKE IT TO CODE

A single self-contained HTML file — copy it and open in any browser, or reuse the prompt with your own pi-agent run.

RUN

modelqwen3.8-max-0902
vendorQwen
harnesspi 0.87.1 · browser iteration
generated2026-10-14

METRICS

runtime170.8s
tokens in131k
tokens out6.3k
cached103k
cost / run$0.1205
Transcript · 21 messages
system

user

Build a full-screen canvas flocking simulation with 150 boids drawn as oriented triangles. Use HTML, CSS, and JavaScript as needed. Write it to `index.html` in the current working directory using your file tools. Inline your own CSS and JavaScript. Do not use external assets, CDNs, or network requests. No third-party libraries are provided. Required behavior: - Combine separation, alignment, and cohesion so nearby boids avoid crowding, align their headings, and form moving groups. Triangles point in their direction of travel. - Use bounded speed and steering so motion changes smoothly instead of teleporting. Wrap boids across screen edges. - Boids within a visible or documented cursor-influence radius steer away from the pointer. They resume flocking after the pointer moves away. - Provide Pause/Resume and Reset. Pause freezes simulation state; Reset restores a fresh population of 150 boids. - Fit the canvas to the viewport and keep the population and controls usable after resizing. Verify: Sample the flock at several moments to check coordinated movement and triangles pointing along their travel direction. Try the cursor interaction with available pointer actions, then pause and resume to check that the flock freezes and continues.

assistant
thinking
Let me try building it, and then testing it in the browser.
→ write /tmp/job-BFdO0G/index.html (10628 bytes)
toolResult

Successfully wrote to /tmp/job-BFdO0G/index.html

assistant
thinking
The simulation state is inside an IIFE and not exposed. To test it in the browser (sampling positions, checking orientation, pausing, etc.), it might be enough to just inspect the DOM via the browser tool. The browser tool can click buttons and take screenshots. As for numerical checks, maybe I can evaluate JS? Available actions: reload, inspect, screenshot, motion, click, drag, key, type, scroll. No "evaluate". So I'll rely on screenshots/motion, and the stats readout via inspect.

Let's load it and take screenshots at various points in time.
→ browser {"action":"reload"}
toolResult

Frame 1, +0ms

[Browser image supplied to model]

{"console":["warning: An iframe which has both allow-scripts and allow-same-origin for its sandbox attribute can escape its sandboxing."],"dom":"Pause\nReset\nMove the pointer to scatter nearby boids (cursor influence radius shown as a faint ring).\nboids: 150 | state: running | frame: 11","images":"attached"}

assistant
thinking
The simulation is running. 150 boids, triangles are visible. A pointer ring is displayed in the top-left corner (is the pointer at 0,0? Actually, mousemove hasn't fired yet. But pointer.active is initially false... the ring visible in the top-left suggests pointer.active is true with x=0, y=0? Wait, the initial state is pointer.active=false. But I can see a faint ring in the top-left. Hmm, maybe the browser harness is moving the mouse to (0,0) or dispatching a mousemove event. In fact, the ring appears centered around (0,0). Probably the harness is dispatching a mousemove at 0,0. No problem.

Next, check the flocking behavior over time: take screenshots at intervals. Use the motion action? "motion" probably captures frames over time. Let me try sampling: wait a bit and then screenshot. The browser tool has a "motion" action that captures motion frames. Let's use that.

The simulation is running with 150 boids. Now let me sample the flock over time to check coordinated movement.

→ browser {"action":"motion"}
toolResult

Frame 1, +0ms

[Browser image supplied to model]

Frame 2, +594ms

[Browser image supplied to model]

Frame 3, +1180ms

[Browser image supplied to model]

Frame 4, +1789ms

[Browser image supplied to model]

{"console":["warning: An iframe which has both allow-scripts and allow-same-origin for its sandbox attribute can escape its sandboxing."],"dom":"Pause\nReset\nMove the pointer to scatter nearby boids (cursor influence radius shown as a faint ring).\nboids: 150 | state: running | frame: 608","images":"attached"}

assistant
thinking
The flock is forming a group that moves together, and the triangles are pointing in the direction of movement (within a flock, the orientations are aligned). Across frames, the flock moves consistently (e.g., the right-side flock moves to the right). Good.

Next, test cursor interaction: move the pointer into the middle of a flock and confirm that the boids scatter. Then pause: click Pause, take 2 screenshots at intervals, and confirm the frame counter is frozen and the positions are identical. Then resume and confirm movement. Then reset and confirm the new population (frame resets to 0, positions are random).

Pointer test: move the mouse to the center of a flock. Use browser click or drag? There's "click" with x,y, and "drag". A mousemove event should fire on click (or drag). Let's drag from (600,400) to (600,400)? Dragging might produce movement. Actually, click should dispatch mousemove+mousedown+mouseup. Let's click at the center of the right-side flock, e.g., (1050, 320). Then take a screenshot and confirm that the ring appears there and the boids avoid it.

Flocks form and move coherently with triangles aligned to travel direction. Now test cursor influence — click inside the right flock.

→ browser {"action":"click","x":1050,"y":320}
toolResult

Frame 1, +0ms

[Browser image supplied to model]

{"console":["warning: An iframe which has both allow-scripts and allow-same-origin for its sandbox attribute can escape its sandboxing."],"dom":"Pause\nReset\nMove the pointer to scatter nearby boids (cursor influence radius shown as a faint ring).\nboids: 150 | state: running | frame: 1251","images":"attached"}

assistant
thinking
The pointer ring is displayed at (1050, 320), and the area inside the ring is empty — the boids have evacuated from there (the flock that was on the right side has now moved to the left of the ring). Good sign. Let me drag the pointer through the flock to observe scattering, then take a screenshot to confirm the avoidance. Actually, the empty ring already indicates avoidance. Let me drag through the center-left flock to confirm active scattering.

The cursor ring is displayed at (1050,320), and its interior is empty — the boids have evacuated. Drag the pointer through the left flock to confirm active scattering, then test pause.

→ browser {"action":"drag","x":1050,"y":320,"toX":100,"toY":430}
toolResult

Frame 1, +0ms

[Browser image supplied to model]

{"console":["warning: An iframe which has both allow-scripts and allow-same-origin for its sandbox attribute can escape its sandboxing."],"dom":"Pause\nReset\nMove the pointer to scatter nearby boids (cursor influence radius shown as a faint ring).\nboids: 150 | state: running | frame: 1701","images":"attached"}

assistant
thinking
The pointer is currently at (100,430), and the ring around it is empty — the flock that was previously on the left has been scattered/moved away. Cursor-based avoidance is working.

Next, test pause: click the Pause button, take two screenshots at intervals, and confirm that the positions are identical and that the frame counter has stopped. After that, resume.

Cursor avoidance confirmed — the ring area is cleared. Now test Pause: click it, then sample twice to confirm freezing.

→ browser {"action":"click","x":60,"y":36}
toolResult

Frame 1, +0ms

[Browser image supplied to model]

{"console":["warning: An iframe which has both allow-scripts and allow-same-origin for its sandbox attribute can escape its sandboxing."],"dom":"Resume\nReset\nMove the pointer to scatter nearby boids (cursor influence radius shown as a faint ring).\nboids: 150 | state: paused | frame: 2122","images":"attached"}

assistant
thinking
Paused at frame 2122. Wait a bit, then take another screenshot to confirm that the frame counter is still 2122 and the positions haven't changed. Use the screenshot action after a bit of time has passed. The screenshot action itself might not introduce any delay. Maybe I can use motion to grab 2 frames at about 600ms intervals.

Paused (state: paused, frame 2122). Verify the freeze holds over ~1.2s with motion sampling.

→ browser {"action":"motion"}
toolResult

Frame 1, +0ms

[Browser image supplied to model]

Frame 2, +583ms

[Browser image supplied to model]

Frame 3, +1173ms

[Browser image supplied to model]

Frame 4, +1772ms

[Browser image supplied to model]

{"console":["warning: An iframe which has both allow-scripts and allow-same-origin for its sandbox attribute can escape its sandboxing."],"dom":"Resume\nReset\nMove the pointer to scatter nearby boids (cursor influence radius shown as a faint ring).\nboids: 150 | state: paused | frame: 2122","images":"attached"}

assistant
thinking
Paused: across all 4 frames spanning about 1.8 seconds, the frame counter stays at 2122 and the positions are identical. Freeze confirmed.

Next, resume: click Resume and verify that the frames advance and the flock moves.

Freeze confirmed — identical frames and frame counter stuck at 2122 across ~1.8s. Now Resume and verify motion continues.

→ browser {"action":"click","x":66,"y":36}
toolResult

Frame 1, +0ms

[Browser image supplied to model]

{"console":["warning: An iframe which has both allow-scripts and allow-same-origin for its sandbox attribute can escape its sandboxing."],"dom":"Pause\nReset\nMove the pointer to scatter nearby boids (cursor influence radius shown as a faint ring).\nboids: 150 | state: running | frame: 2130","images":"attached"}

assistant
thinking
Resumed: state is running, frame advanced from 2122 to 2125/2130, and boids moved slightly from their paused positions.

Next, test Reset: click Reset and verify that the frame counter resets to about 0 and that a new random population is displayed.

Resume works (frame advancing again, boids moving). Now test Reset.

→ browser {"action":"click","x":131,"y":36}
toolResult

Frame 1, +0ms

[Browser image supplied to model]

{"console":["warning: An iframe which has both allow-scripts and allow-same-origin for its sandbox attribute can escape its sandboxing."],"dom":"Pause\nReset\nMove the pointer to scatter nearby boids (cursor influence radius shown as a faint ring).\nboids: 150 | state: running | frame: 5","images":"attached"}

assistant
thinking
Reset works: frame counter returns to about 2-5, and a new uniformly random population of 150 boids is displayed.

Remaining check items: behavior on resize. The browser tool doesn't have an explicit resize action... viewport is fixed at 1200x800. Can I test resize via JS? There's no evaluate action. Hmm. Actions: reload, inspect, screenshot, motion, click, drag, key, type, scroll. No resize. I can reason about the code: the resize handler updates the canvas size and wraps boids within the new bounds. The controls are position:fixed so they remain usable. This is reasonable, but unverified in the browser.

One more thing to double-check: the "mouseout" handler sets pointer.active=false only when relatedTarget is null (when leaving the window). No problem.

Potential issue: on reset, if paused, reset unpauses. This is a design choice, acceptable ("Reset restores a new population of 150 boids").

Another check: keyboard Space toggles pause only when target is body; no problem.

Edge case: when W or H is 0? Not applicable.

Also, confirm that the triangle orientation matches the direction of travel: in the motion frames, the flock's triangles point in the direction of the group's movement (e.g., the right flock moving right shows rightward-pointing triangles). Confirmed visually.

I think I can also quickly verify that the pause button's label toggles correctly (confirmed: Pause -> Resume -> Pause). Good.

Resize test: maybe I can simulate it by another method—no, impossible. I'll record it as unverified, but the code handles it (canvas resizes with DPR, boids are wrapped within bounds, controls are fixed-positioned).

One more consideration: the task says "boids within the visible or documented cursor influence radius steer away from the pointer. Once the pointer leaves, they resume flocking." After the drag, the pointer stays at (100,430); in the reset screenshot, the ring is still displayed in the upper left (the pointer is at the Reset button position? Actually, the ring's center is around (131,36)? The ring in the last screenshot is centered near (130, 30)—the pointer is on the Reset button. Boids near it are avoiding it. No problem.

"Once the pointer leaves, they resume flocking"—after the pointer leaves (mouseout with no relatedTarget), active=false and the ring disappears; boids resume normal flocking. In the earlier drag screenshot, the flock re-formed away from the pointer. Sufficient.

All verified. Final answer: summarize the check items and note that resize was not verified in the browser (viewport fixed), but the code handles it.

Actually, maybe I can verify resize indirectly: the browser tool's viewport is fixed at 1200x800; can't change it. Skip.

Done—report.

All core behaviors verified. Final state of the app is saved at `/tmp/job-BFdO0G/index.html`. **What I checked in the browser:** - **Initial load**: 150 boids render as oriented triangles on a full-viewport canvas; console clean (only a sandbox iframe warning from the harness, not the app). - **Flocking over time** (4 motion samples ~1.8s): boids form distinct moving groups; within each group the triangles share a common heading that matches the group's travel direction (e.g., right-side flock translating right with right-pointing triangles). Separation keeps spacing, cohesion/alignment hold groups together. - **Smooth motion**: steering is force-capped (`MAX_FORCE`) with min/max speed bounds; frames show gradual turns, no teleporting. Wrapping is implemented toroidally (also used in neighbor distance). - **Cursor influence**: clicking at (1050,320) showed the documented influence ring (radius 130px, drawn on canvas) with its interior emptied of boids; dragging through the left flock scattered it. When the pointer leaves the window (`mouseout`/`touchend`), influence deactivates and flocking resumes. - **Pause**: button toggles to "Resume", stats show `state: paused`, and 4 motion frames over ~1.8s were pixel-identical with the frame counter frozen at 2122. - **Resume**: state returns to running, frame counter and motion continue from the frozen configuration. - **Reset**: frame counter returns to ~0 and a fresh uniformly-random population of 150 boids appears; stats confirm `boids: 150`. **Not verified in-browser:** window resize (the harness viewport is fixed at 1200×800). The code handles it via a `resize` listener that resizes the canvas with devicePixelRatio scaling and re-wraps boids into the new bounds, while controls are `position: fixed` so they stay usable — but this path was only reasoned about, not exercised.